lapsus linguae

Friday, November 05, 2004

Climb Every Mountain...

Last night I picked up Zen And the Art of Motorcycle Maintanence after almost two years and flipped open a page. 205. And the words that flew out seemed oddly appropriate.

Up ahead all of Chris' movements seem tired and angry. He stumbles on things, lets branches tear at him, instead of pulling them to one side.

I am sorry to see this. Some blame can be put on the YMCA camp he attended for two weeks just before we started. From what he's told me, they made a big ego thing out of the whole outdoor experience. A proof-of-manhood thing. He began in a lowly class they were careful to point out was rather disgraceful to be in... original sin. Then he was allowed to prove himself with a long series of accomplishments - swimming, rope tying... he mentioned a dozen of them, but I've forgotten them.

It made the kids at camp much more enthusiastic and cooperative when they had ego goals to fulfill, I'm sure, but ultimately that kind of motivation is destructive. Any effort that has self-gratification as its final endpoint is bound to end in disaster. Now we're paying the price. When you try to climb a mountain to prove how big you are, you almost never make it. And even if you do, it's a hollow victory. In order to sustain the victory you have to prove yourself again and again and again and again, driven forever to fill a false image, haunted by the fear that the image is not true and someone will find out. That's never the way.

Phaedrus wrote a letter from India about a pilgrimage to holy Mount Kailas, the source of the Ganges and the abode of Shiva, high in the Himalayas, in the company of a holy man and his adherants.

He never reached the mountain. After the third day he gave up, exhausted, and the pilgrimage went on without him. He said he had the physical strength but that physical strength was not enough. He had the intellectual motivation but that wasn't enough either. He didn't think he had been arrogant but thought that he was undertaking the pilgrimage to broaden his experience, to gain understanding for himself. He was trying to use the mountain for his own purposes and the pilgrimage too. He regarded himself as the fixed entity, not the pilgrimage or the mountain, and thus wasn't ready for it. He speculated that the other pilgrims, the ones who reached the mountain, probably sensed the holiness of the mountain so intensely that each footstep was an act of devotion, an act of submission to this holiness. The holiness of the mountain infused into their own spirits enabled them to endure far more than anything he, with his greater physical strength, could take.

To the untrained eye ego-climbing and selfless climbing may appear identical. Both kinds of climbers place one foot in front of the other. Both breathe in and out at the same rate. Both stop when tired. Both go forward when rested. But what a difference! The ego-climber is like an instrument that's out of adjustment. He puts his foot down an instant too soon or too late. He's likely to miss a beautiful passage of sunlight through the trees. He goes on when the sloppiness of his steps shows he's tired. He rests at odd times. He looks up the trail trying to see what's ahead even when he knows what's ahead because he just looked a second before. He goes too fast or too slow for the conditions and when he talks his talk is forever about somewhere else, something else. He's there but he's not here. He rejects the here, is unhappy with it, wants to be farther up the trail but when he gets there, will be just as unhappy because then it will be "here." What he's looking for, what he wants, is all around him, but he doesn't want that because it is all around him. Every step's an effort, both physically and spiritually, because he imagines his goal to be external and distant.

That seems to be Chris' problem now.

My intention, in the first place, was to make an intelligent observation or two on the above. But I can't seem to think of anything. Hmm. What needs to be said has been said.

Thank you for the profound words, Mr. Pirsig.

5 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

hey hey..those paras are one of the most accessible in the book and they are my favourites!!

have u read the lila? In many ways the stuff there seemed to be more understandable to me..
Pirsig somewhere seemed to have said that lila was a more important work than the zen..i dont know why he said that.do you know? have u read lila?

reading the zen.. is a great pleasure every time!! the language, the description of the everyday stuff is so enjoyable..you find this quality in r k narayan and amit chaudhuri(the afternoon raag). pick up the book sometime

the zen and its subject-object dualism and the Quality that helps us overcome this dualism is something i seem to understand in the everyday context..are u sure if what is called advaita (which is also a unitary philosophy) has something to do with what mr pirsig has to say???

i was so enamoured by the phaedrus character that
i used that as paswords, ids in many internet accounts!! that name still holds magic in it!!

Monday, November 08, 2004 10:02:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

hey hey..those paras are one of the most accessible in the book and they are my favourites!!

have u read the lila? In many ways the stuff there seemed to be more understandable to me..
Pirsig somewhere seemed to have said that lila was a more important work than the zen..i dont know why he said that.do you know? have u read lila?

reading the zen.. is a great pleasure every time!! the language, the description of the everyday stuff is so enjoyable..you find this quality in r k narayan and amit chaudhuri(the afternoon raag). pick up the book sometime

the zen and its subject-object dualism and the Quality that helps us overcome this dualism is something i seem to understand in the everyday context..are u sure if what is called advaita (which is also a unitary philosophy) has something to do with what mr pirsig has to say???

i was so enamoured by the phaedrus character that
i used that as paswords, ids in many internet accounts!! that name still holds magic in it!!

Monday, November 08, 2004 10:03:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

that was me!
maheshc.

Monday, November 08, 2004 10:06:00 AM  
Blogger Woodworm said...

True, ZAMM has wonderful moments - many many in the first 250 pages - before the truth fully emerges about Phaedrus. But the first time I read it two years ago, the insights of the first part of the book seemed grossly out of tune with the latter - which essentially deals with compromises that you need to make with everything, even the philosophy that you thought he so forcefully advances so far. But, perhaps here is where you can find Zen in the work - ultimately it all boils down to nothing but living in the present with no a-priori expectations from the past nor destructive analysis of the future. The simple message from ZAMM is "being".

But the book is still very disturbing, especially when I learnt that this is not a work which is complete fiction. And about Chris's subsequent freak death and about Pirsig's self-imposed exile. Things he says .... were really lived. Shocking.

Monday, November 08, 2004 11:18:00 PM  
Blogger Isaac Carmichael said...

I love this blog! It's early, and I've nothing very intelligent to say right now, but you've got to know how cool you are.

Friday, April 01, 2005 8:23:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home